Westbrook v. Rhodes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
This is an action in ejectment. The defendant in error was plaintiff in the trial court, and the plaintiff in error was defendant below. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the court below.
Plaintiff instituted this suit to recover possession of certain land, described in his amended petition as follows:
“All that certain strip of land lying between the north boundary line of blocks 178 and 180 in the city of Miami, Okla., according to supplemental plat No. 1 of said numbered blocks and the north boundary line of the city of Miami, Okla., said strip being 25…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Flesher v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Wade v. Crouch and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Keller v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Martin v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Rucker v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bachenheimer v. Palm Springs Management Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Ashur v. McCreerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Pauls Valley Nat. Bank v. FossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Yargee v. McMillanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Beamer v. KeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.