Legal Opinion

In Re the Contempt of the Supreme Court of Indiana, Fox

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 2003No. 49S00-0304-CO-168Published

1Per curiam

The Disciplinary Commission alleged that attorney Travis Raymond Fox continued to represent criminal defendants after being suspended from the practice of law for failing to pay his attorney registration and education fees. Respondent Fox and the Commission have tendered for our approval an agreed resolution of this matter, which we accept today, thereby finding the respondent to be in contempt of this Court.

I. Procedure

On April 23, 2008, the Disciplinary Commission filed a Verified Information and Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Respondent Should Not Be Held In Contempt of Court. Pursuant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of CrumpackerIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Contempt of the Supreme Court of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re LowryIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API