Legal Opinion
State v. Clark
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 1996No. 63636-2PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
920 P.2d 187 (1996)
STATE of Washington, Petitioner,
v.
Richard M. CLARK, Respondent.
No. 63636-2.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued June 26, 1996.
Decided August 8, 1996.
Jim Krider, Snohomish County Prosecutor, S. Aaron Fine, Deputy, Everett, for petitioner.
Snohomish County Public Defender, William Jaquette, III, Everett, for respondent.
TALMADGE, Justice.
After deciding to seek the death penalty for Richard M. Clark, the State did not serve the special notice on Clark or his counsel personally. Instead, relying on a long-standing agreement between the Snohomish County Prosecutor's Office…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.