Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 30, 1996No. 96-2025PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellant challenges an order of the trial court by which his motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) was denied. Although the motion states a facially sufficient basis for his entitlement to unforfeited gain time under State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989), the appellant has not asserted, and it does not. otherwise appear from the record before us, that his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum for his offense. See Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995); King v. State, 681 So.2d 1136 (Fla.1996). Accordingly, the appellant’s claim…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. King v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  4. Sullivan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Ford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vanderblomen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API