Legal Opinion

Interstate Metal v. Gibler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 29, 2009No. 0604819; A137260PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Employer seeks judicial review of an order by the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) ruling that claimant filed a timely claim for benefits based on carpal tunnel syndrome and that the disease was compensable because claimant’s employment activities were its major contributing cause. We affirm.

The following facts are undisputed. Claimant worked for employer as an office manager and customer service representative for 29 years. Approximately half of each workday was spent telephoning, writing by hand, keyboarding, using a “10-key” calculator, and filing. In 2002, experiencing some pain in her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Bohemia, Inc. v. McKillopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. FREIGHTLINER LLC v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baker v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API