Legal Opinion

Raber v. Hyde

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1904No. Docket No. 165PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Cheboygan; Shepherd, J. Replevin by Philip W. Raber and Artemus D. Watson, copartners as Raber & Watson, against Robert N. Hyde. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This is an action of replevin to recover the possession of certain railroad ties. These ties were made by one William Meden, and it must be assumed on this record that they were made from timber growing on certain State tax lands. Before the ties were made, Meden had contracted to sell them to plaintiffs, the place of delivery being specified as Bellant’s Landing, on Lake Huron. Meden had also, it seems, agreed in a prior contract to sell the ties to the defendant. The place of delivery specified in this contract was High Banks, a point on Lake Huron about two miles north of Bellant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allen v. CowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ed Black's Chevrolet Center, Inc. v. MelicharNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Morse v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Craighead v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Toolan v. LongyearMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API