In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Walgren
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentGoodloe, J.
(dissenting) — The majority holds that Gordon Walgren, subject to certain prerequisites and upon completion of his parole, may be reinstated as a member of the Washington State Bar. With this determination, I cannot agree.
I object because this court should not review a petition for reinstatement from a disbarred attorney still on parole and because a disbarred attorney, as a matter of law, cannot show rehabilitation until an adequate time has passed after completion of his parole.
No case was found where a court approved the reinstatement of a disbarred attorney while the disbarred attorney…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- In Re EddlemanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re LonerganWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KroghWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Petition of SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.