People v. Smith
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Howard E. Goldfluss, J.
The defendant herein moves to suppress a statement alleged to have been made by him after he was read his Miranda rights. The question posed by this motion is unique because the statement sought to be introduced is alleged to have been overheard by a police officer while the defendant was in the process of using the telephone in the police squad room to call a relative. The People take the position that these statements were made voluntarily by the defendant — were not coerced— and that such statements are admissible.
The defendant sets forth two…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. FerrellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- People v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. McFaddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. BrewerNew York Supreme Court · 1996