Fenner & Beane v. Nelson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrenceStephens, P. J.
I concur in the conclusion that it appears from all the evidence that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, and that there appears no error in the direction of the verdict for the defendant. In reply to the suggestion that a nonsuit would lie only at the completion of the plaintiff’s evidence, and therefore would not lie after the defendant had introduced evidence and the case had been closed, there appears no authority to the effect that a nonsuit may be granted only at the end of the introduction of the plaintiff’s evidence, but in decisions of the Supreme Court it seems to be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Shippey Bros. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Watson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Battle v. Royster Guano Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Cook v. Attapulgus Clay Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.