Courchaine v. Bullion Mining Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, Storey County. The facts are stated in the opinion; but it may be added that the original judgment was rendered while the Hon. Caleb Burbank was the Judge of the Court, and the new trial granted by his successor.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, Storey County. The facts are stated in the opinion; but it may be added that the original judgment was rendered while the Hon. Caleb Burbank was the Judge of the Court, and the new trial granted by his successor. I. Admitting that a declaratory statement, and payment of money, would give sufficient title upon which to recover against a naked trespasser, yet it does not appear that the land in question was subject to pre-emption; that the law bringing it into market had been complied with, or that plaintiff had brought himself…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Lewis, J.
The plaintiff, who is an occupant of certain lots in the city of Gold Hill, brings this action against the defendant to recover five hundred dollars, in which sum he claims to have been damaged by reason of the deposit upon his premises of large quantities of rock, *373dirt, and refuse ore. The complaint also contains allegations, upon which an injunction is sought, to restrain the defendant, its agents, servants, and employés from repeating or continuing the trespass complained of. It is admitted by the defendant that the plaintiff was in the actual possession of the two…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Talbott v. KingMontana Supreme Court · 1886
- Shoemaker v. HatchNevada Supreme Court · 1878
- Kunkel v. Utah Lumber Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905
- Schmidt v. SadriNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Deno v. GriffinNevada Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.