Voyles v. Murray
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WOODWARD, District Judge.
Plaintiff in this case claims that he was the employee of defendant and that his employer was subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act and that for the weeks during which the plaintiff worked more than 40 hours he was entitled to additional compensation under Sections 206 and 207 of said Act, Title 29, U.S.C. § 201 et seq.
This Court has entered its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, but briefly, the facts are as follows:
Defendant was the sole proprietor of an enterprise located in Lubbock, Texas, which had as its principal activity the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roland Electrical Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cearley v. CearleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Willis v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Underberg v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sparks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
- Marshall v. R & M ERECTORS, INC.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Brennan v. ParnhamDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Jackson v. R & A Towing, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2023
- Sparks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986