Legal Opinion

Park v. Mighell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1893No. 1026PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Fierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

This case was here once before (3 Wash. 737; 29 Pac. Rep. 536), when it appeared that the facts *305had not been found by the referee. A judgment had been rendered for the sum of §300 in favor of the plaintiff, but there was no finding upon many of the issues made by the pleadings, and apparently, so far as the record disclosed, there never had been a complete trial. Upon that ground the case was reversed and sent back for a re-trial, with directions to make findings upon these matters. The order contemplated that it should go back to the same…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Park v. MighellWashington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bullard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Wilson v. HorsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Mount Vernon Dodge, Inc. v. Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. McCarthy v. WynneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  5. Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API