Azewen-Jik Kante v. Nike, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Azewen-Jik Kante appeals pro se from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Nike, Inc. on statute of limitation grounds. We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment on statute of limitation grounds de novo. Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. v. Locke, 568 F.3d 757, 764 (9th Cir.2009). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
The facts of this case are known to the parties. We do not repeat them.
The most favorable limitations period for each of these claims is six years. 1 See Everman v. Lockwood, 144 Or.App. 28, 925 P.2d 128, 129-30 (1996)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jaqua v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Chaney v. Fields Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Everman v. LockwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kante v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010