Legal Opinion

Pitts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 20, 1963No. 4299PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Judge.

This cause arises upon denial of appellant’s sworn motion to vacate a judgment and sentence entered consequent upon a plea of guilty to the crime of grand larceny. The motion, filed pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, is prolix and consists, in large part, of allegations of bald legal and factual conclusions. However, it does contain certain allegations meriting attention. Specifically, the motion alleges that “in the February term of Court” the appellant was deprived of counsel and the assistance of counsel for his defense, that he was not informed of his right to counsel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Roy v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  3. Webster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. Ashley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Andrews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Barker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Trimble v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. Newman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API