Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Leta Moore

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 19, 1972No. 19070Published

1DissentBiggs, Circuit Judge

The majority opinion with an eager and commendable desire to achieve symmetry in the law fails to grasp the essentials of the principle behind the law of Maine 1 as expressed in Bedell v. Rea*795gan, 159 Me. 292, 192 A.2d 24 (1963). Not only does the majority opinion fail to grasp the essential principle but also goes so far as to create a common law tort for the law of Maine, and a federal common law tort as well under the Medical Care Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C., § 2651, et seq.2

*796I.

The Present Existing Barrier of Absolute Disability Preventing One Spouse from Suing the Other and Children from Suing…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API