Legal Opinion
New Hampshire Insurance v. Cruise Shops, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.
Plaintiff New Hampshire Insurance Company seeks a judicial declaration that a policy it issued to defendant Cruise Shops, Inc. was canceled and terminated as of a specified date, and that it was replaced by a policy issued by defendant Interstate Fire & Casualty Company.
*61By stipulation dated March 4, 1971, made in the trial calendar part, it was agreed that Cruise Shops was entitled to the payment of $48,000 by either or both companies, subject to the ultimate determination of the issue of coverage.
The facts are as follows:
An insurance policy presumably covering the loss here in question was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crown Point Iron Co. v. Ætna InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Whited v. . Germania Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Glens Falls Insurance v. Founders' InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Gately-Haire Co. v. . Niagara Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Bache v. Great Lakes Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lee v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Graves v. Republic InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Grayson-Carroll-Wythe Mutual Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1984
- United States Naval Institute v. Charter Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.