Cary v. Hatch
New York Supreme Court
Action to-recover back moneys claimed to have been paid for taxes levied against lands of another.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Plaintiff brings this action under the provisions of chapter 384 of the Laws of 1909 of this state, as amended, to foreclose a claimed lien of city and county tax certificates of sale; it is not an action to divest or forfeit title to land, but an action to recover back moneys claimed to have been paid for taxes levied against the lands of another.
A considerable number of points have been raised by defendant Hatch. Inasmuch as I have decided to find for the plaintiff I shall discuss these points separately in order that the parties may have my reasons for reaching my conclusion.
Defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cary v. . KoernerNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Fulton v. . KrullNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Bradley v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- In re LambNew York Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by1 opinion
- Conway v. North Side Lumber Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1931