Legal Opinion

Wadsworth v. Erwin

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodenbeck, J.:

This is an action by a taxpayer to recover moneys for the county of Livingston, paid for services and disbursements of a member of the board of supervisors, instituted on the ground of want of authority to authorize the employment; where it appears that the services were rendered and the disbursements made without col*894lusion, fraud or bad faith and where the services were of a. substantial and valuable character and the county accepted and still retains the benefits thereof; except as to a portion of the moneys received, not revealed, which it is claimed were received for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stetler v. . McFarlaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Wallace v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. People ex rel. Vaughn v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burns v. City of WatertownNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Novoa v. Secretario de Hacienda del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto RicoTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API