Burns v. City of Watertown
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCheney, J.
These two actions are brought as taxpayers’ actions to restrain the commission of certain official acts by the defendants *142other than the city of Watertown, who are the mayor and councilmen of said city, on the ground that they are illegal and constitute waste of the funds of said city. An injunction has been granted in each of the cases, with an order to show cause why it should not be continued pendente lite, and the matter is before the court upon the return of such orders to show cause. As the alleged illegal acts complained of and the relief asked in each case are the same the two cases…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Otsego County Bank v. Board of Supervisors of Otsego CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Taggart v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- People, Ex Rel. Mason v. . McClaveNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Allen v. FinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Cleveland v. . City of WatertownNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- R. & B. Builders, Inc. v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Blanshard v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Heydeman v. County of RocklandNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- In re the Estate of FerraraNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- Novoa v. Secretario de Hacienda del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto RicoTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2009