Legal Opinion
State v. Cumming
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 15, 1993PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
David Cumming appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction following a jury trial in the Superior Court (Piscataquis County, Kravchuk, J.) for intentional and knowing murder and depraved indifference murder. 17-A M.R.S.A. § 201(1)(A) & (B) (1988). Cumming contends that the trial court erroneously refused to suppress certain incriminating statements Cumming made to his father and two police officers, and challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for acquittal and the trial court’s jury instructions. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment.
On the evening of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. CrockerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. LagasseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- State v. FlickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. CaouetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. BridgesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- State v. HANAMANSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Banther v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- State v. CarrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- State v. DanielsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.