Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carner v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1953No. Docket 61; Calendar 45,535PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1DissentBoyles, J.

Plaintiff, as the widow surviving her husband George Carner, was allowed dependency compensation* by the workmen’s compensation commission because of his death from an injury received while an employee of the defendant company. On leave granted the defendant appeals in the nature of certiorari, and the principal question involved is whether his injury arose in the course of his employment. *221Plaintiff’s decedent was employed by defendant in its retail store in Battle Creek as a salesman-serviceman in its sewing machine and vacuum sweeper department. A sewing-machine customer who lived in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brinkman v. ZuckermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Murphy v. Flint Bd. of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Murphy v. KuhartzMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Haggar v. TanisMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Tegels v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Certified Refrigeration, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Heidtman v. Nevada Industrial CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Troxel v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
  4. Weersing v. Airseal Insulating & Roofing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Carner v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API