Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Galwey

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 14, 1904PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Action of replevin, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the jury before Q-ager, J.; verdict and judgment for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The greater part of the goods in question under the present writ were, in two former actions of replevin by one Unmack, a receiver in bankruptcy of the defendant, adjudged to belong, some to the plaintiff, and the rest to a copartnership of which he was a member. Unmack v. Douglass, 75 Conn. 638. The defendant, under a plea of the general issue, offered in evidence the files of two pending actions, one brought by the plaintiff and the other by said copartnership, on the replevin bonds given in the former cases. In each it was alleged that a return of the goods and payment of the damages and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frisbie v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  2. Walko v. WalkoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  3. Bradley v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Fuel Co. v. McNeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. State v. NagyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. State v. FleckensteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Adolph Gottscho, Inc. v. American Marking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. In Re CohenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API