Legal Opinion

Grady v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

This is an action on account for merchandise sold and delivered, instituted by appellant Grady, as the successor of the firm of Holcomb & Grady, against appellee. The contention of appellant in the trial below was that the goods sold were delivered to Cheshire, Sanders & McWhorter, but that the credit was extended solely to appellee.

Appellee was engaged in the manufacture of lumber, and employed Cheshire, Sanders & McWhorter to haul logs from lands situated near the place of business of Holcomb & Grady.

McCurry was appellee’s woods foreman, having supervision of the cutting and removal of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Millsaps v. NixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Pake v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arkansas Valley Feed Mills, Inc. v. Fox De Luxe Foods, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1959
  2. Oil City Iron Works v. BradleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Elm Springs State Bank v. BradleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Jackson v. PoolSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API