Legal Opinion

Lamar Tennessee, LLC v. City of Hendersonville

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 11, 2005No. M2003-00415-COA-R3-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HighersAlan E. Highers, J.

in which DAVID R. FARMER, J., and HOLLY M. KIRBY, J., joined.

In 1987, a billboard advertising company obtained a permit to construct a billboard, approximately seventy-five (75) square feet in size, along a stretch of roadway in Hendersonville, Tennessee. At the time of issuance, the applicable zoning ordinance stated the billboard could not exceed eighty (80) square feet in size. Later that same year, the city passed a new zoning regulation providing that billboards could no longer be erected in the area as a primary use. Instead, billboards could only be erected as an accessory use…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bain v. WellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. McCarley v. West Quality Food ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Central SouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Anderson v. Standard Register Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. SNPCO, INC. v. City of Jefferson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Smith County Regional Planning Commission v. Hiwassee Village Mobile Home Park, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. 600 Marshall Entertainment Concepts, LLC v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
  4. Lamar Tennessee, LLC v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  5. Manhattan, Inc., D/B/A New York New York v. Shelby County, Tennessee, City of Memphis, and Memphis – Shelby County Office of Construction Code EnforcementCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API