Legal Opinion

600 Marshall Entertainment Concepts, LLC v. City of Memphis

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided September 21, 2011No. 05-cv-2865PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

BERNICE B. DONALD, District Judge.

This matter came before the Court on the request of Petitioner 600 Marshall Entertainment Concepts, LLC, d/b/a The Spot (“600 Marshall”) for injunctive and declaratory relief. 600 Marshall asserts that the City of Memphis (“the City”) wrongfully denied it a Compensated Dance Permit (“CDP”) without a prohibition on adult entertainment because 600 Marshall is entitled to “grandfathering.” After a nonjury trial on June 9-10, 2008, the Court found that 600 Marshall failed to carry its burden of showing, by a preponderance of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

600 Marshall Entertainment Concepts, LLC v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013