Speight v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
4 Va.App. 83 (1987)
354 S.E.2d 95
KENNETH WAYNE SPEIGHT
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Court of Appeals of Virginia
March 17, 1987
Michael HuYong, for appellant.
Eugene Murphy, Assistant Attorney General (Gerald L. Baliles, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.
Defendant appealed his convictions of grand larceny and distribution of heroin. He argued that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions (Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, James M. Lumpkin, Judge).
The Court of Appeals, en banc, affirmed, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support both convictions. On the larceny…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Bishop v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Speight v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- Carter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
- Stover v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.