Legal Opinion

Speight v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 17, 1987No. 0104-85Published

1Opinion of the Court

4 Va.App. 83 (1987)

354 S.E.2d 95

KENNETH WAYNE SPEIGHT

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Court of Appeals of Virginia

March 17, 1987

Michael HuYong, for appellant.

Eugene Murphy, Assistant Attorney General (Gerald L. Baliles, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Defendant appealed his convictions of grand larceny and distribution of heroin. He argued that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions (Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, James M. Lumpkin, Judge).

The Court of Appeals, en banc, affirmed, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support both convictions. On the larceny…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  2. Bishop v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. Speight v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  4. Carter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  5. Stover v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API