Legal Opinion
Utah Power & Light Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 16, 1930No. J-670PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, Judge.
The plaintiff brings this suit to recover $14,995 alleged to have been wrongfully collected from it by defendant for use of land occupied by a certain power plant belonging to plaintiff known as the Granite plant. It bases its right to a refund of the money so paid upon, first, the Act of March 4, 1907 (34 Stat. 1270), which in substance and effect provided for the refund of money paid “for the use of any land or resources of the national forests in excess of amounts found actually due from them to the United States”; and second, a decree.entered by the United States District…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harding v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Kelley v. MilanSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Gay v. ParpartSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Janesville Cotton MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- International Bldg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. J. Myer SchineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- O'Cedar Corporation v. FW Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
- Phoenix Finance Corp. v. Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Rector v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.