Legal Opinion
X-G-W
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2002No. ID 3352PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3352 In re X-G-W-, Applicant Decided June 25, 1998 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Due to a fundamental change in the definition of a “refugee” brought about by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Division C of
Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110
Stat. 3009-546, the Board of Immigration Appeals will allow reopening of proceedings to pursue asylum claims based on coerced population control policies, notwithstanding the time and number limitations on motions specified in
8 C.F.R. § 3.2
(1997).…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- C-Y-ZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
- J-JBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
- HBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
- CHANGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Tigran Ekimian Rouzan Nagapetian Avetis Hekimian v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Li Yong Zheng v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Jian Huan Guan v. Board of Immigration AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- G-DBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- C-W-LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.