Legal Opinion
Hauge v. District Court
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 2001No. 01-508PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*196OPINION AND ORDER
¶ 1 Before the Court is Trent Hauge’s Petition for Writ of Supervisory Control wherein he argues that the District Court’s denial of his motion to suppress was a mistake of law resulting in a gross injustice. On July 31, 2001, we accepted jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to Rule 17, M.R.App.P. At that time we ordered Respondents to file a response to the search and seizure issues raised by Hauge. We further ordered that all proceedings in the District Court for the Twenty-Second Judicial District, Stillwater County, regarding State v. Hauge, Cause No. 00-19, be stayed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. John Spilotro Herbert Blitzstein and Joseph C. BlaskoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Jose Robert Gomez-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. MartinezMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. St. MarksMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CotterellMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. DeshawMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MorseMontana Supreme Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.