Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Robert Gomez-Soto
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1984No. 82-1459PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURTIS, District Judge:
Appellant Gomez-Soto (Gomez) appeals his conviction of violating Title 21 U.S.C. § 963 [conspiracy to import cocaine]; Title 21 U.S.C. § 846 [conspiracy to distribute cocaine]; and three counts of violating Title 26 U.S.C. § 7201 [income tax evasion]. Gomez was tried and convicted by the court below, sitting without a jury.
Gomez asserts that: (1) the evidence seized by virtue of the March 19, 1981 search warrant was improperly admitted against him, because the warrant authorizing the search was so general in nature as to violate the fourth amendment; (2) closed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Howard Christine, Perry GraboskyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. John Spilotro Herbert Blitzstein and Joseph C. BlaskoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Enrique EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Victor Montano DislaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.