Legal Opinion

Pulliam v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 11, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Clarke

Affirming.

Appellant was accused and convicted of possessing moonshine whiskey in violation of the first section of the Rash-Grullion Act (Ky. Statutes, 2554a-l), and a previous conviction of a like offense against the same act. 'His punishment was fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for three years, which is the maximum punishment authorized. for a second conviction by section 2 of the act (Ky. Statutes, 2554a-2).

The chief reliance for reversal is that the verdict is so excessive as to indicate passion or prejudice upon the part of the jury. It…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lakes v. GoodloeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Sizemore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Cloninger v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Skidmore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. Addington v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keifner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Henderson and Pierce v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API