Commonwealth v. Roberts
Washington County Court of Quarter Sessions
1Opinion of the Court
Brownson, P. J.,
The Constitution in section 3 of article in provides: “No bill, except general appropriation bills, shall be passed containing more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title.”
*448Our appellate courts have laid down and firmly established the following rules, settling the effect of this constitutional provision:
1. The inclusion in a statute of an enactment dealing with a subject not covered by the title of the act renders the statute pro tanto unconstitutional: Commonwealth v. Frantz, 135 Pa. 389, 392.
2. Even if the title should contain a general statement of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sugar Notch BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Page v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Mallinger v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth v. BarbonoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.