Legal Opinion
Terwilliger v. York International Corp.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided September 12, 1997No. Civ. A. No. 92-00131PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
I. Introduction.
Pending is the plaintiffs motion to quash pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) and 45 and his motion for a protective order. The court exercises jurisdiction over this diversity action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
II. Background.
On September 4, 1992, Gerald L. Terwilliger filed suit against York International Corporation and its subsidiary, Bristol Compressors, Inc. (jointly referred to herein as “York”). Terwilliger alleges that he entered into an oral contract with the Chief Operating Officer of Bristol Compressors, Michael Young. Terwilliger alleges that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gus Poulos and A.G.P. Marketing v. Naas Foods, Incorporated and Ranks, Hovis, McDougall Plc Group (Rhm Holdings U.S.A. Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America v. Energy Gathering, Inc., John Fox, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Cymaticolor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- A. Farber & Partners Inc. v. GarberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Kidwiler v. Progressive Paloverde InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2000
- Aliotti v. Vessel SenoraDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Weststeyn Dairy 2 v. Eades Commodities Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2003
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ceridian Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.