Legal Opinion

Bishop v. John Doe 1

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1990No. 89-2154PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

902 F.2d 809

Stephen BISHOP, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JOHN DOE 1, public employee who installed the black pipe

speed bag frame at the north facility in the 3B exercise

pens attached to the x-pod wall; John Doe 2, public

employee whose scope of duties was to inspect, repair or

cause to be repaired the black pipe speed bag frame; John

Doe 3, public employee who authorized the installation of

the black spped bag frame in the 3B exercise pen attached to

the x-pod wall; John Doe 4, public employee whose scope of

duties was to inspect the building containing x-pod and to

repair or cause to be repaired any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Florida Department of State v. Treasure Salvors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Wojciechowski v. HarrimanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1985
  4. Bishop v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ward Ex Rel. Ward v. Presbyterian Healthcare ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1999
  2. Gerhardt v. MaresDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
  3. Archibeque v. WylieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Childers v. KaufmanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024
  5. Curry v. GonzalesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API