Legal Opinion

Roper-Simpson v. Scheck

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 20, 2006No. 04-5533-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Order of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Casilda E. Roper-Simpson (“Roper-Simpson”) appeals from the September 28, 2004 Memorandum and Order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Johnson, J.) finally determining the fee disputes among lawyers who provided legal services to Abner Louima: Roper-Simpson; Brian Figeroux and Carl W. Thomas (“Thomas & Figeroux”); Johnnie L. Cochran, Peter Neufeld, and Barry C. Scheck (“CN&S”); and Sanford Rubenstein (“Rubentstein”).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Herman v. Davis Acoustical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Naiman v. New York University Hospitals CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Empire United Lines Co., Inc. v. FeldmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
  2. Guzik v. Lendit Conference, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  3. United States v. Pressman-Gutman Co., Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API