Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip H. Warshaw, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 14, 1934No. Nos. 5821, 5756, 5739, 5791PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

The complaints in the above-entitled eases allege in substance that the above-entitled *96defendants were granted permits to -withdraw quantities of specially denatured alcohol, and that, pursuant to said permits, bonds were executed.

The government alleges in the complaint of United States v. Flora Chemical Corporation and Eagle Indemnity Company, the unlawful diversion of 18,000 wine gallons of specially denatured industrial alcohol; in United States v. Amarosa Company (George M. Miller and Samuel Miller) and Royal Indemnity Company, the unlawful diversion of 6,009…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United Cigar Whelan Stores Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. Helvering v. Druggists' Specialties Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
  3. United States v. U. S. Industrial Alcohol Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1934
  4. United States v. Van Schaack Bros. Chemical Works, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1940
  5. United States v. RosenzweigDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API