Legal Opinion

Roberts Cone Mfg. Co. v. Bruckman

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1920No. 5310PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri; Joseph W. Woodrough, Judge. Suit in equity by Frederick A. Bruckman and others against the Roberts Cone Manufacturing Company and others. Decree for complainants, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

Appeal from decree of infringement of Bruckman patent No. 1,071,027, covering a machine to manufacture *987ice cream cones. This decree was on a supplemental bill. The original proceeding was for infringement of the same patent by another machine, and resulted in a consent decree, adjudging validity and infringement of the Bruckman patent, and enjoining use of the machine there involved. This consent decree was entered during the trial of the case as a result of a licensing arrangement then made. Thereafter appellants changed the machine being used by them and refused to pay…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roberts Cone Mfg. Co. v. BruckmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Warner v. Tennessee Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  2. International Bldg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  3. O'Cedar Corporation v. FW Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  4. American Cone & Wafer Co. v. DenaroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
  5. McLaren Products Co. v. Cone Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API