Legal Opinion
Kirkby v. Public Service Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 1948No. Docket No. 48, Calendar No. 43,835PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.
Roy and Floyd Denoyer, doing business as Denoyer Brothers, hereinafter called defendants, made application to the Michigan public service commission for a certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage in the transportation of household goods to any point in Michigan from Traverse City or immediate vicinity. The commission gave notice of the application, its contents and date of hearing thereon to the common motor carriers operating in the territory proposed to be served. At the hearing one of the defendants was sworn as a witness and stated that the authority sought was to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Miller v. TarryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Sparta Foundry Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. Michigan Railroad CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Buckeye Stages, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Union Carbide Corp. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Associated Truck Lines, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Building Owners & Managers Ass'n of Metropolitan Detroit v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- A. B. & C. Motor Transportation Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Building Owners & Managers Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.