Legal Opinion

Hills v. Gautreaux

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 20, 1976No. 74-1047PublishedCited by 219 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has been judicially found to have violated the Fifth Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in connection with the selection of sites for public housing in the city of Chicago. The issue before us is whether the remedial order of the federal trial court may extend beyond Chicago’s territorial boundaries.

I

This extended litigation began in 1966 when the respondents, six Negro tenants in or applicants for public housing in Chicago, brought separate actions on behalf of themselves and all other Negro tenants and applicants…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Davis v. Board of School Comm'rs of Mobile Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. North Carolina State Board of Education v. SwannSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by219 opinions

  1. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. General Building Contractors Assn., Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API