Legal Opinion

(PC) Gosztyla v. Gu

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 1, 2025No. 1:22-cv-00610Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CHANTELL GOSZTYLA, Case No. 1:22-cv-00610-KES-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT: 12 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE DR. 13 WEI GU, et al., FEINBERG’S EXPERT OPINION BE DENIED; and 14 Defendants. DEFENDANT GU’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 15 JUDGMENT BE GRANTED. 16 (ECF No. 57; ECF No. 64) 17 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 18 19 Plaintiff Chantell Gosztyla is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API