Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Timothy Miller

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 11, 2006No. 04-5834, 04-6116Published

1Dissent

JUDITH M. BARZILAY, Judge.

I respectfully dissent as I believe that the central issue in this case is whether Miller’s 1986 guilty plea to narcotics possession in a Georgia court that resulted in a two-year probation under the state’s first offender act was a “conviction” under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A).1

Section 841(b)(1) provides for sentence enhancement where the defendant com*825mits the federal violation “after a prior conviction for a felony drug offense has become final .... ” 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) (emphasis added). Miller pleaded guilty to a violation of the Georgia Controlled Substance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McKoy v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. State v. WileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  5. Dean v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API