Legal Opinion

Davis v. Connell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1972No. 7219SC24PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

Plaintiff contends the court erred in permitting defendant to file an amendment to her answer during the course of the trial. The amendment alleges that the collision was caused by defective brakes on the Falcon automobile; that plaintiff’s intestate knew the brakes were defective, and that her negli- genee in operating the automobile in such a condition was a proximate cause of her death.

G.S. 1A-1, Eule 15(a) provides that leave to amend pleadings shall be freely given when justice so requires. Subsection (b) of Eule 15 provides in part: “If evidence is objected to at the trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Jones v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Day v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Cockman v. PowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Hunt v. Carolina Truck Supplies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carrington v. EmoryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Roberts v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Beaman v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API