Legal Opinion

State v. Altum

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 27, 1987No. 8595-0-II; 8596-8-IIPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Alexander, A.C.J.

In this consolidated appeal, Darrell Stallone and Roger Altum each appeal their convictions of two counts of first degree rape and one count of second degree robbery. They primarily object to the trial court's imposition of exceptional sentences. We hold that the trial court did not err in imposing the sentences and that the defendants' other assignments of error have no merit. Thus, we affirm.

Before trial on the above stated charges, Stallone, who had made incriminating admissions to police, moved to suppress the evidence of his statements. He claimed that he did not make a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. OxborrowWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Caughey v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. AllertWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. ChaddertonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API