Legal Opinion

Medina Supply Co. v. Corrado

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1996No. 70561PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Karpinski, Judge.

Defendants, Kenneth Corrado and Northpoint Homes, Inc., appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their motion to vacate the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Medina Supply Company, Inc. Plaintiff obtained judgment on a cognovit note signed by defendants. Defendants moved to vacate this judgment because the warrant-of-attorney provision on the cognovit note was not sufficiently highlighted on the note. The trial court denied this motion to vacate. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court below.

Defendant Kenneth Corrado is the president…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Adomeit v. BaltimoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Maust v. Bank One Columbus, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Huntington National Bank v. Burda, 08ap-658 (4-14-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Advanced Clinical v. Salem Chiropractic, Unpublished Decision (1-12-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Classic Bar Billiards v. Samaan, 08ap-210 (11-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Manor Care Nursing & Rehabilitation Center v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Gardner v. TallmadgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API