Legal Opinion
Jonas v. Power Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a claim for damages resulting from a condemnation, the claimants appeal, on the grounds of inadequacy, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Court of Claims (McCabe, J.), dated July 22, 1991, as, after a nonjury trial, awarded them the principal sum of $41,477, consisting of direct damages, and denied their claim for consequential damages for the partial taking of their property.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In 1986, the State of New York, on behalf of the Power Authority of the State of New York (hereinafter PASNY)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Criscuola v. Power AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. OlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- City of Buffalo v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In re the Acquisition of Real Property by Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Town of Islip v. SikoraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Town of Islip v. Mustamed Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995