Legal Opinion

Criscuola v. Power Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1993PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bellacosa, J.

Appellants are claimants who seek direct and consequential market value damages for a high voltage power line easement acquired by the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY) over their Delaware County property. The only issue before us centers on the claim for consequential damages, based on the claimants’ assertion that "cancerphobia” and the public’s perception of a health risk from exposure to electromagnetic emissions from power lines negatively impact upon the market value of their property and "will render the remainder valueless.” They argue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willsey v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  2. Ryan v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land, More or Less Situated in Leflore County, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Mehlenbacher v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Cellular Telephone Co. v. Village of TarrytownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Roth v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Baker v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API