People v. Skinner
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order appealed from should be affirmed. The initial brief streetside interrogation of defendant was far less intrusive than is a traditional arrest, and thus need not have been supported by probable cause as long as the police had "a reasonable suspicion, based on objective facts, that the individual is involved in criminal activity” (Brown v Texas, 443 US 47; see CPL 140.50; People v Moore, 47 NY2d 911; cf. Dunaway v New York, 442 US 200). We cannot say that the courts below erred as a matter of law in finding that the actions of the officers in this case…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. FinlaysonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. RosarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. MeredithNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Carter v. ScullyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.