People v. Samuels
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The case comes to us on the following affirmed findings of fact: Detective Fougere observed -defendant enter a novelty shop on 42nd Street and purchase a holster for a .25 caliber *1037automatic pistol. The detective followed defendant down 42nd Street after defendant left the shop, showed his shield and identified himself as a police officer and asked defendant why he purchased the holster. Defendant’s only response was to put his hand into his coat pocket. Told to remove his hand from his pocket, defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. FinlaysonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. Siu Wah TseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.