Legal Opinion

Kaspar v. Keller

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1971No. 4994PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILSON, Justice.

This is a suit on a note and on a temporary injunction bond. Motions for summary judgment by appellee Keller against appellants Kaspar and Aetna Insurance Co. were sustained. We affirm in part, and in part reverse.

Kaspar executed an installment deed of trust note to Keller as part consideration for realty purchased under a contract of sale. Kaspar sued Keller for rescission of the contract of sale, recovery of a $75,000 down payment and cancellation of the note, alleging the sale was induced by fraud. Keller answered but filed no counterclaim on the note.

While the suit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hampshire v. GreevesTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF NEVADANevada Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Patterson v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Southland Life Ins. Co. v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Babington v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Huston v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  2. Will Thurman, Jr. v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. El Paso Development Co. v. Berryman, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. La Mansion Hotels & Resorts, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
  5. Phillips v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In Re Phillips)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API