Legal Opinion

Supreme Council of Royal League v. Moerschbaecher

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 12, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Assumpsit, on a certificate of insurance. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County: the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1899.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Sears

delivered the opinion of the court.

The controlling question presented upon this appeal is whether the constitution and by-laws of the appellant order, together with the stipulation executed by the insured, operated to make the entering into the business of a saloon-keeper, at once suspend all beneficial rights under the certificate, or whether it was necessary that some affirmative action be taken by the order to suspend such rights. The constitution of the order precluded those engaged in the business of keeping a saloon from membership. The bylaws in force when…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Supreme Council v. CurdIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Hogins v. Supreme CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Langnecker v. Trustees of the Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United WorkmenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Modern Woodmen of America v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Modern Woodmen of America v. WielandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  4. Dillon v. National Council of the Knights & Ladies of SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  5. National Union v. ShipleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API